The Right to Withdraw

Speculative Civic Architecture / Public Infrastructure
The Right to Withdraw
A civic typology for temporary withdrawal in the overstimulated city
A place to pause should not always require a purchase or an explanation.
2026
In brief
- The question
- What if temporary withdrawal were treated as public infrastructure rather than a private wellness problem?
- Creative decision
- Use a doorless, ninety-degree entrance to propose privacy through geometry rather than a lock, booking or purchase.
Selected output
Concept images and a plan study for a speculative competition proposal. The structure has not been built.


Project facts
- My contribution
- Concept · Research · Spatial Direction · AI-assisted Visual Prototyping
- Delivered
- A public-withdrawal proposal translated into a spatial specification and visual prototype for a short individual pause in civic space.
- Context & status
- Speculative competition proposal · unbuilt
Research & process
01 · The spatial need
What kind of pause do existing public places leave open?
The proposal does not medicalise overload or sell calm as a service. It asks the city to recognise pause as a basic spatial need—ordinary, public and available without purchase.
Temporary withdrawal can be a public spatial need.
02 · The spatial answer
No lock. No door. Privacy begins with geometry.
A 1.9 by 1.9 metre concrete volume uses a ninety-degree entrance, thick walls and a narrow skylight to bend sight and sound. One person enters; the city remains present but no longer immediate.
- 01
Civic, not commercial
No booking, purchase or wellness language is required.
- 02
Privacy without enclosure
The L-shaped entrance blocks direct sight while remaining visibly open.
- 03
One honest material
Board-marked concrete gives the object the language of infrastructure.
- 04
Calibrated light
A narrow skylight lowers intensity without turning pause into theatre.
03 · Visual prototype
The object had to read as infrastructure before it read as retreat.
The image sequence follows the spatial experience: from street to threshold, pause, plan and return. The studies test geometry, visibility, material and sensory reduction; they are development material, not built proof.



04 · Status
A resolved proposal, not a built object.
The project currently exists as a competition proposal, spatial specification, 3D model and visual research. Siting, engineering, accessibility and public-operation testing remain future work.
Start a conversation
hello@tomtjonaloi.xyz ↗